Right, so Malaysia has taken possession of three Israel-bound containers, which are now hanging around one of Southeast Asia's busiest ports like lost luggage. They have been sitting there since 19 August without batting an eyelid, awaiting divine intervention or for someone in Tel Aviv to explain why a Malaysian port should do as it’s told.
Malaysia has banned Israeli shipping and Israel-bound cargo since 2023, which, if you were already aware of this, might make you wonder what all the fuss is about now. And it’s a case of, they always made an exception when they get to play the middle man. Transhipment as its called, where cargo gets offloaded from one vessel to another, without ever being imported, so Malaysia don’t technically handle the goods, they just let others do it instead.
That changed on 7 August however, when Malaysian border officials pulled a container reportedly headed for Elbit Systems, Israel’s weapons giant, aside for a spot of very unwelcome attention.
Now, Malaysia did not say it had found weapons. It said it was investigating whether the contents amounted to controlled or strategic goods. But Elbit ended up discovering nonetheless, that a shipping manifest, even an Israeli one, is not, in fact, a royal decree ordering Malaysian authorities to mind their own business.
Two weeks later came three more containers bound for Ashdod in Israel. They also got held while Malaysia reviewed the cargo and Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim decided nobody should be left squinting at the shipping labels trying to work out the message as if they were written in code. Malaysia, he said, would not allow itself to become “a conduit for any shipment that supports or contributes to Israel’s military capabilities.”
And that is when the policy stopped being a statement and started becoming enforcement.
Another container supposedly bound for Elbit Systems has also now since been dumped in customs, because nothing quite says ‘Welcome’ like getting dropped off at the office without a return ticket.
So here's the catch Israel find themselves caught by their pinky toe in: Israel can build armament factories, can stockpile ships as if they were Pokémon cards, can make arrangements with every shipping company in the world, but in the end it is another man's crane that moves, another man's customs official who stamps the passport, and another government that decides to make or break.
Malaysia is simply the latest to show what happens when a rubber stamp meets a big fat “not so fast” sign, but given Malaysia’s logistical position though, this one hurts.
While Israel seeks assurances that the shipping lines from Asia will be safe from “foreign interference,” Malaysia has given a vivid illustration of why it is Israel that has the same concern.
The vessel reaches a foreign port.
The foreign port has taken an interest.
But all of a sudden, Israel’s supply system was no longer functioning according to the Israeli timetable.
Sovereignty is a funny thing. Israel loves its own; and it is indignant when Malaysia remembers that it has some as well. Do they not know about the Zionist chosen status? Apparently the manifests don’t mention it. What a bother.
Malaysia’s version of events there. Governments can issue statements by the bucketload though can’t they? All packed with firm assurances, deep concerns, and enough verbal padding to cushion the ego of those who care.
But a box that stays at the port is a different matter; it's real, it’s something tangible, valuable, it's awkward, and somebody is looking at an empty shed wondering where their precious load went. It’s Border Force gone mad they might say.
The three containers in question were detained at the Port of Tanjung Pelepas on 19 August, said to be destined for Ashdod in Israel.
It’s relevant now though, because the news of all of this has only now actually broken, nearly a month later and all because those containers are still being held.
According to the reported shipping manifests, they were carrying electric-bike parts from the Chinese manufacturer Chongqing Mobimax Technology. Doesn’t sound like missile or drone bits and bobs then does it?
But this is where Malaysia's legal argument comes into play. You see, the Malaysian contention is that it will not let its ports become a transhipment point for cargo that supports Israel's military capability. By its 2023 declarations, Malaysia has already restricted Israeli shipping and Israel-bound cargo of course.
This is the snag now though-these containers were transhipment cargo, going through Malaysia but not actually imported. Normally, as I explained a moment ago, such cargo would fall into a legal grey area where Malaysia just stood off to the side. So, instead of announcing an indictment, the authorities are holding the cargo pending further investigation. And they don’t appear to be in any rush!
Malaysian authorities have not had to declare the e-bike parts contraband. They did, however, declare that an Israel-bound shipment moving through a Malaysian port could be stopped and searched apparently without a time limit on that as its all still sat there a month later. The exact provision of law invoked to stop these three containers is not known yet either, making the story frankly all the funnier to me, but this is also, at least in part, why they are still under investigation rather than being seized.
What all this tells us, is that all of a sudden, Malaysia has stopped merely searching for any blatantly military items before taking an interest. Cargo bound for Israel is inspected and delayed. At the same time, officials examine it and hold it until they decide what it is, where it's going, and whether it violates Malaysian policy or law.
These containers may eventually be released. Eventually being the operative word. They may contain everything listed on the manifest, but until the Malaysian authorities finish their examination, they will remain where they are.
That delay is already in itself a repercussion.
The goods have not arrived in Ashdod; the shipping timetable has been broken.
Malaysia does not need to discover the lost arsenal of Genghis Khan for this to sting. The Israeli trade in one of Asia's busiest ports has been obstructed, and that alone is enough to make Tel Aviv reach for the antiperspirant.
And of course this actually isn't the first time it's happened, because it brings us back now to the first container headed to Elbit Systems.
On 7 August the Malaysian authorities stopped this container at the Port of Tanjung Pelepas.
It was an incident involving a single container reportedly sent from the Philippines.
Elbit Systems is of course one of Israel’s biggest arms firms, making drones, artillery systems, military electronics, surveillance equipment, and a whole series of other highly sophisticated devices that are meant to make Israel’s enemies a lot less lively and with our government here in the UK, placard wielding pensioners and protesters armed with a bit of paint a lot less lively too if they can manage it.
The news that it was on its way to Elbit Systems had already made the authorities suspicious. That was enough for a Malaysian eyebrow to rise.
The Border Control and Protection Agency, AKPS, said it would investigate the nature, characteristics, purpose, use, and classification of the goods, including whether they fall under the category of strategic goods under Malaysian law.
This Bernama report concerns the earlier Elbit-linked container.
So what’s the proof that it was loaded with weapons then?
Well there is no need to jump to that conclusion really, because the facts themselves already said a lot. A container en route to an Israeli arms manufacturer was clearly enough for Malaysian authorities to want to stop it and check what was inside. Perfectly understandable I would have though.
Just a fortnight later, authorities stopped three other shipments en route to Ashdod though. Makes you wonder what they might have found on the first one in which case then doesn’t it?
The two incidents are quite distinct though: each involves a different type of cargo and is addressed to a different destination – one container to Elbit Systems, three later containers for the Port of Ashdod. Nevertheless, together they show that Malaysia is taking Israel-bound shipments seriously – presumably they have a reason - and, it seems are opting to check them out rather than let them pass without question as they have with transhipments previously.
And as I say, logistically, this is pretty critical for Israel.
Tanjung Pelepas is not exactly an idling backwater, with a few fishing boats and a customs office which clocks off for a three-hour siesta each day.
In Southeast Asia, this port is one of the largest container ports. Over 90 per cent of the goods that pass through it are transhipment cargo.
Many of these goods do not enter the Malaysian market therefore. They arrive, they are transferred between ships, and they go elsewhere.
They are just passing through.
It is all just continual-fast, predictable, and about as politically significant as a cockroach at a health department inspection.
And of course all of this comes on top of the historic beef Malaysia has with Israel.
Malaysian policy did not suddenly turn on its head in 2023. Israel has never been officially recognised by Malaysia, which has maintained no diplomatic relations with the state, and support for the establishment of a state of Palestine had been a firm part of its foreign policy for many years. They’ve been onto them for far longer than so many of us in the West have.
The main difference between Israel’s invasion of Gaza and what was the case before it was that Anwar Ibrahim’s government finally moved away from hand-wringing over it all and decided to impose restrictions on ships, goods, and ZIM, the Israeli owned shipping giant. Hence the newest detentions, which are not the result of Malaysia suddenly growing a spine, but of checking whether its old spine is still in good working order.
And yet for all of this, the position of transit freights is more ambiguous, for the goods are only transiting.
They are not meant to be Malaysia’s concern.
But now Malaysia has decided that some of these are actually its responsibility.
No more ministers proclaiming Malaysia’s profound opposition to Israel, and then allowing the next ship through with a nod and a wink it seems. The real cargo is now being stopped, while officials rummage through the papers and boxes.
Israel is massively dependent on seaborne trade, because I don’t know if you might have noticed, but they have a bit of a habit of upsetting their neighbours a bit. Bombing them tends to do that. As such though, Israel’s trade network depends heavily on ports like this.
It depends on foreign ships and foreign terminals, shipping companies, dockers, customs officers, and governments scattered all over the world.
This gives Israel enormous influence, but it also means that other countries, should they choose to intervene, have considerable leverage if they host said ports.
That’s what makes everyone suddenly so occupied with their own shoelaces. Israel demands the benefit of the world’s merchant system with all its advantages. At the same time, it treats all the local stops along its route as though Israeli cargo has some kind of a diplomatic status.
Look but don’t look.
Don’t question.
And if you can’t quite make out whether your destination is Ashdod or Elbit Systems, don’t worry your pretty little head about it.
Malaysia seems to be losing its appetite for this joke now.
The Israelis are afraid of such interference; we know that because the shipping industry is so quick to point it out.
The German company Hapag-Lloyd, which signed an agreement in February to acquire that Israeli shipping company ZIM for roughly $4.2 billion, needs Israel's approval because Israel has special rights to ZIM. The acquisition raises questions about the safeguarding of Israeli maritime interests after the acquisition.
Hapag-Lloyd points out that its amended proposal will strengthen Israel's maritime security and independence.
Which is a very original definition of independence, if we might be charitable about it.
Israel’s independence of the seas was to be assured, apparently, by a German company with an international fleet which would travel through foreign ports and under the auspices of foreign governments. You do surprise us Germany, who would of thought this of you?
Independence though, with many people needed to bring it about.
But then came the more revealing bit.
Hapag-Lloyd declared that it would insure the safety of Israeli traffic on vital sea routes, particularly those from Asia, and at the same time guard against foreign interference with the transport of Israel’s sensitive cargoes. Hmm, I wonder where I could be going with this now!
Access from Asia.
Sensitive cargo.
Foreign interference.
According to some reports, the Malaysian authorities had seized an earlier Elbit-linked container that was being transported by..oh look! It was Hapag-Lloyd!
Now while Hapag-Lloyd and the Malaysian government say their ZIM contract will prevent unauthorised seizure of its shipments, Malaysia has just shown exactly how it can interfere.
A harbour official becomes suspicious.
One container gets detained.
An investigation begins.
And so the so-called safe cargo sits and waits until a foreign government decides how to proceed. Then it’s three more containers.
Malaysia has not, however, broken the supply system in Asia.
It has simply shown why Israel needs those German guarantees and, well how much of a guarantee truly are they?
This shows that the network works only if all the countries involved maintain cooperation. The moment one country stops, Israel is taught, through a Malaysian container, the limits of its maritime independence.
Anwar Ibrahim has now made Malaysia's position clear.
He said the country was no longer willing to become a platform for shipments which would enable or assist Israel’s military power and the repression of Palestinians and others in their area of responsibility.
Under Malaysian law, the government was empowered to inspect and investigate suspicious cargo and, where violations were established, to prosecute. We await to see if that happens.
They do not declare every shipment to Israel unlawful.
The final destination and the possible end-use can also be subjected to investigation though.
When an entire maritime industry is founded on the principle of “Move along now, nothing to see here,” preferably at warp speed, and with absolutely no fuss or commotion, such an investigation is a headache for everyone.
The cargo owners don’t want any questions.
The shippers don't want the containers delayed at the quays.
Customers would not like to hear that their cargo might reach the next port only after the Malaysian Customs Service has finished with it.
Malaysia has taken a political position and tied it to the movement of physical commodities.
Governments, which have hitherto made merely protests, have been forced now to take practical measures, with which Israel will have to cope. The power of ordinary people applying pressure, we’ve seen it the world over.
And Israel’s panic button is beginning to show some wear.
Not about bicycle pedals, not about ranting in an office (though that would have been a sight)—but Israel had something to say about it.
The Israeli government retaliates against such things, consider the reaction to Ed Miliband’s measly UK sanctions when Britain moved a millimetre against settlement-linked interests. The Hapag-Lloyd Company has reassured Israeli authorities that it will safeguard its maritime access; Malaysia is still weighing whether to allow Israel-bound containers to proceed when it comes to their ports though, very much not in line with Germany’s quisling acquiescence to the apartheid state.
And Israel I’m sure can see the vulnerability perfectly well, their reliance on sea trade is no secret.
It is this vulnerability that people are anxiously trying to secure guarantees against.
And while we wait and see how Malaysia’s investigations into these four containers pans out, Israel finds itself facing a problem that cannot be solved either by yelling threats or scribbling its signature on another ship sale.
What if other major ports begin to take the same interest?
What if Ashdod on a manifest becomes grounds for scrutiny?
What if Elbit Systems as the destination makes customs officials look twice?
Not everywhere, not every shipment, but often enough for carriers, purchasers, and insurers to have to think about it.
That is how a political problem turns into a supply problem.
This is the weakness of Israel's supply system. Shipments can be labelled commercially, strategically, or even secretly; Britain can be pressured; German shipping companies can be prevailed upon to give guarantees; but it can't force Malaysia to do business as if its ports were Israeli agencies. Malaysia has turned Israel's worldwide supply chain from a smooth, uninterrupted conveyor belt into an obstructed and delayed system, with delays, investigations, and escalating political costs. They’ve hit a rock in the middle of the road and they can’t go around it.
For more tiny violin inducing stories of Israeli misfortune, do stick with the channel for more, such as this story right here.
Please do also hit like, share and subscribe if you haven’t done so already so as to ensure you don’t miss out on all new daily content, as well as spreading the word and helping to support the channel at the same time, which is very much appreciated, holding power to account for ordinary working-class people, and I will hopefully catch you on the next one. Cheers folks.