Link to interview with David Martin by Alex Jones.
(Buy Me A Coffee doesn't do Rumble Embeds.... Bad BuyMeACoffee, Bad)
Introduction
In a riveting interview with Alex Jones on InfoWars, Dr. David Martin delves into the origins, development, and broader implications of COVID-19. The conversation spans decades of research and alleged manipulation of the coronavirus, uncovering what Martin describes as a long-term plan involving pharmaceutical companies, government institutions, and global organizations. This article explores the key points discussed in the interview, highlighting the controversial perspectives and calls to action presented by Dr. Martin.
🧬 The Origins of Coronavirus
The Bioweapon Narrative
Dr. David Martin asserts that the coronavirus has been utilized as a biological weapon since 1966. He elaborates on the early research aimed at exploring its potential as an infectious agent. Initial experiments involved infecting British volunteers to observe the virus’s effects, marking the beginning of its use in bioweapons research.
Pfizer’s Early Involvement
In 1990, Pfizer filed a patent for a coronavirus vaccine. Martin sees this as evidence of the company’s early involvement and foreknowledge of the virus’s potential use. He suggests that this early patent indicates a long-term strategic plan, culminating in the events of the COVID-19 pandemic.
🧑🔬 Ralph Baric’s Modifications
Targeting the Cardiovascular System
Ralph Baric’s work at the University of North Carolina in 1999 led to significant modifications of the coronavirus. By altering the virus to target heart tissue, Baric created a replication-defective clone designed to inflame the cardiovascular system. This development, according to Martin, was a key step in weaponizing the virus for future use.
Gain-of-Function Research
During the gain-of-function moratorium, Baric’s research continued under voluntary compliance. Martin criticizes this loophole, arguing that it allowed dangerous research to proceed unchecked. He discusses the ethical and legal implications of these actions, emphasizing the need for stricter enforcement of such regulations.
📈 The Engineered Pandemic
Strategic Execution
Martin asserts that the COVID-19 pandemic was not an accidental outbreak but a strategically planned event. He describes the involvement of global organizations and influential figures, including the World Health Organization, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and Anthony Fauci. These entities, he argues, orchestrated the pandemic to enforce global control measures.
Media’s Role
The media played a crucial role in sustaining the pandemic narrative. By amplifying fear and promoting compliance, the media helped to achieve behavior modification on a global scale. Martin argues that this was a deliberate strategy to ensure widespread acceptance of vaccination and other control measures.
💉 mRNA Vaccine Critique
Harmful Spike Proteins
According to Martin, the mRNA vaccines instruct the body to produce harmful spike proteins. This process effectively turns vaccine recipients into bioweapons factories, manufacturing a synthetic pathogen within their bodies. Martin criticizes this approach, highlighting the potential health risks associated with these vaccines.
Pseudo Uridine and Cancer
Martin points out the inclusion of pseudo-uridine in mRNA vaccines. This compound, he explains, is known to suppress the body’s natural tumor-suppressing mechanisms, increasing the risk of cancer and other health issues. He argues that the use of pseudo-uridine was a calculated move to enhance the vaccine’s stability at the expense of public health.
🏛️ Political and Institutional Complicity
Criticism of Politicians
Martin does not spare politicians from criticism, particularly Rand Paul, whom he accuses of not fully addressing the origins and manipulation of the virus. He suggests that many politicians are complicit in these activities, either through direct involvement or by failing to act on the available information.
Institutional Failures
The interview also highlights institutional failures in handling the pandemic. Martin discusses the shortcomings in enforcing ethical standards and regulations in scientific research, arguing that these failures allowed for the unchecked development and deployment of bioweapons under the guise of public health measures.
🌐 Global Control Agenda
Universal Vaccine Agenda
The discussion frames the pandemic within a broader conspiracy involving global health organizations pushing for a universal vaccine. Martin identifies entities like the World Economic Forum and the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board as key players in advancing this agenda.
Social Credit System
Another focal point is the implementation of a global control grid through vaccine passports and social credit systems. Martin argues that these measures are designed to enforce compliance and behavior modification on a massive scale, furthering the control agenda of global elites.
📜 Historical Context and Precedents
Lessons from Past Pandemics
Martin draws parallels to past pandemics and bioweapon use, such as the 2001 anthrax attacks and the 2003 SARS outbreak. He emphasizes the recurring nature of these strategies for control and profit, suggesting that the COVID-19 pandemic follows a similar pattern.
Nuremberg Code and Ethical Standards
The interview revisits historical legal and ethical lessons, particularly the Nuremberg Code. Martin stresses the importance of adhering to these principles to prevent future abuses in bioweapon and vaccine policies. He calls for greater accountability and transparency in scientific research and public health initiatives.
📣 Call to Action
Increasing Public Awareness
Martin underscores the need for increased public awareness and resistance against the global control efforts he describes. He urges people to see through the manipulation and act accordingly to protect their rights and freedoms.
The importance of independent media in disseminating truth and countering mainstream narratives is highlighted. Martin encourages support for platforms like InfoWars that provide alternative perspectives on current events and promote critical thinking among the public.