Bill Clinton's Georgetown Professor said your vote was worthless in 1972!
Carroll Quigley's lecture, "The Mythology of American Democracy," presents a profound critique of the American democratic system, deconstructing the idealistic narrative that surrounds it. Delivered in 1972 to the Industrial College of the Armed Forces, Quigley's analysis explores the historical, structural, and philosophical aspects of democracy in the United States. He challenges the widely accepted notions of democratic tradition and highlights how the system has deviated from its supposed ideals.
🧭 Introduction: Debunking the Myth
Quigley begins by stating that while the United States is indeed a democracy, much of what is believed about American democracy is mythological. He defines democracy as a system of majority rule coupled with protecting minority rights, emphasizing that the latter is more critical. Quigley illustrates how, historically, despotic regimes like Nazi Germany or Communist China have had majority support without being democratic, underlining that true democracy cannot exist without minority rights.
🗝️ The Importance of Minority Rights
Quigley argues that minority rights are the cornerstone of democracy, allowing minority groups the ability to operate within the system and eventually become the majority. He contrasts this with regimes where the suppression of minority rights leads to authoritarianism, regardless of whether majority rule is in place. For Quigley, the erosion of minority rights poses a far greater threat to democracy than deviations from majority rule.
📜 Democracy vs. Other Political Values
Quigley provocatively asserts that democracy is not the highest political value, challenging the romanticized view of democracy as the ultimate political system. He argues that other values, such as security, stability, and political responsibility, often take precedence over democratic principles. A responsible government, in his view, is one that accurately reflects the actual distribution of power within society, even if that means governance by an elite minority rather than a majority.
🛠️ The Role of Weaponry in Democracy
Quigley introduces an unconventional theory about the relationship between democracy and the distribution of weapons in society. He posits that democracy became viable in the United States around 1880 because weapons were inexpensive and widely available, making it impossible for any minority to impose its will on the majority. In societies where weapons are expensive and difficult to use, such as medieval Europe with its knights and castles, democracy is not feasible because power is concentrated in the hands of those who control these powerful weapons.
🗳️ The Realities of Elections and Nominations
A significant portion of Quigley's lecture is dedicated to examining the electoral process in the United States. He argues that the outcome of elections is often determined by those who do not vote rather than by those who do. With voter turnout frequently hovering around 50%, the real power lies with the nonvoters, who could sway the election if mobilized. Additionally, Quigley stresses that the nomination process is more critical than the election itself. The ability to choose candidates is more influential than the actual voting process because it controls who the public can ultimately vote for.
🏴☠️ The Evolution of American Democracy
Quigley traces the history of American democracy through five distinct stages:
Legislative Caucus Era (1789-1840s): Candidates were chosen by legislators, reflecting a limited democratic process where the public had little direct influence.
Spoils System (1840-1880s): The introduction of nominating conventions and the spoils system, where political loyalty was rewarded with government positions, marked a shift toward mass democracy. However, this system was heavily influenced by party machines and corruption.
Big-Business Domination (1884-1932): The Pendleton Act of 1883 and the rise of civil service reduced the power of party machines, leading to an era where big business took control of the political process. Voter participation declined as politics became dominated by economic elites.
New Deal and Organized Blocs (1932-1950s): The New Deal era saw the organization of various interest groups, including labor unions and farmers, which sought to counterbalance the power of big business. This period marked a shift toward a more pluralistic and organized political landscape.
Plutocracy (1950s onwards): Quigley describes the current era as one of increasing plutocracy, where money plays a dominant role in politics. The influence of corporations and the concentration of wealth have led to a system where elections are often bought rather than won through popular support.
⚖️ The Constitution's Flaws and Extraconstitutional Developments
Quigley critiques the U.S. Constitution, arguing that it is more republican than democratic. The Constitution's focus on limiting government power and protecting minority rights is important, but it also has significant weaknesses, particularly in its failure to provide clear guidance on administrative and incorporating powers. Quigley also points out that key aspects of the American political system, such as political parties and judicial supremacy, developed outside the Constitution and lack accountability to the people.
🏛️ The Threats to Democracy
Quigley identifies several major threats to democracy:
Money in Politics: The growing influence of money in elections is a significant threat to democratic governance. As campaign costs rise, the ability of ordinary citizens to influence politics diminishes, leading to a system dominated by wealthy individuals and corporations.
Corporate Power: Corporations, with their legal status as "fictitious persons," have become powerful actors in the political system. Their resources and legal rights surpass those of individual citizens, making them a significant threat to democracy.
Presidential Power: Quigley warns about the concentration of power in the presidency, where the President wears multiple hats, including head of state, head of government, and commander in chief. This concentration of power can lead to abuses and undermines the checks and balances that are supposed to protect democracy.
Mass Culture and Uniformity: The rise of mass culture and the push for uniformity, particularly in education, are seen by Quigley as threats to the diversity and excellence that democracy requires. He argues that democracy thrives on diversity, and efforts to enforce uniformity undermine the system.
Legal and Constitutional Deviation: Quigley emphasizes the danger of deviating from legal and constitutional norms. When the rule of law is compromised, the legitimacy of the government is undermined, leading to a reliance on force rather than democratic principles.
🛠️ Proposed Reforms
Quigley concludes his lecture with several proposals to strengthen democracy:
Reduce the Influence of Money: He advocates for public financing of elections and other measures to reduce the role of money in politics, thus leveling the playing field for all candidates and ensuring that elections are more democratic.
Internalize Social Restraints: Quigley emphasizes the importance of internalized social restraints in maintaining a healthy democracy. He suggests that building a culture of responsibility, both within the government and society at large, is crucial for the long-term survival of democratic institutions.
Strengthen Pluralism: Quigley calls for the creation of a pluralistic system where various groups can check each other's power, preventing any single group from dominating the political landscape.
Focus on Human Needs Over Gross Growth: He argues for a shift from gross economic growth to a focus on meeting human needs through more efficient and sustainable means. Quigley suggests that technological innovation should be used to improve living standards without overexploiting resources.
Constitutional and Legal Reforms: Quigley advocates for reforms that bring the legal framework closer to the actual distribution of power in society. He believes that aligning legal and actual power structures will reduce the risk of irresponsible decision-making and ensure that the government reflects the true dynamics of power.
💬 Discussion and Reflections
In the discussion following his lecture, Quigley addressed questions about his views on reducing gross growth, the powers of the President, and the importance of the nomination process. He reiterated the need for a responsible government that accurately reflects society's power structure and warned against the dangers of an all-professional military, which could threaten democracy if not properly restrained.
Quigley's analysis offers a sobering critique of American democracy. It challenges the audience to rethink their assumptions about the system and consider the structural reforms necessary to preserve and strengthen democratic governance in the face of mounting challenges.