Spain’s ruling Socialists once promised to abolish prostitution. Four years on, the bill is nowhere near law, parliamentary allies have blocked even its first steps, and voluntary sex workers remain in a legal limbo that is neither full criminalisation nor recognised labour.
This reporting is part of the Sex Worker Visibility Project: policy coverage that starts from the people who do the work, not from the slogans around them. If that is useful to you, support it on Patreon or Buy Me a Coffee.
The sequence is straightforward. In 2022 the PSOE tried to fold client and third-party penalties into the broader “solo sí es sí” consent law. The addition nearly sank the bill and was pulled. A standalone abolition proposal was registered the same year and died with the legislative term. In 2024, under Equality Minister Ana Redondo, the party tried again. Congress would not even open formal consideration. Sumar voted against it.
That does not leave workers in a safe status quo. Voluntary adult sex work is not, by itself, a crime in Spain. It also has no clear national labour framework — neither as self-employment nor as employment. Autonomous communities regulate clubs and entertainment venues. Municipalities lean on civility and public-space ordinances. The result is a patchwork: possible fines for street presence, uncertainty about rights, and no coherent path to workplace protections.
Psychologist, sexologist and activist Luna Wine, speaking to Spanish media this week, put the structure plainly. At state level there is no clear recognition of sex work as labour. Regions focus on premises. Cities focus on noise, streets and coexistence rules. Workers have been fined under those municipal rules; Wine cited one interview subject carrying €6,000 in penalties for “intensive” use of public space. Legal insecurity and physical insecurity travel together.
Exit programmes have absorbed real money. One government plan associated with the previous Equality ministry spent tens of millions of euros aiming to move a few hundred people into other work. That is a policy choice. It is not a labour code. It does not answer what rights apply to people who stay, or who enter the industry for economic reasons that have not disappeared.
Looking at the next election cycle, Wine’s assessment was bleak: abolitionist language still runs through much of the parliamentary spectrum, while options that favour regulation or labour recognition lack the weight to set the agenda. The feeling among many workers, she said, is abandonment — the sense that no major party is prepared to treat them as interlocutors rather than as a problem to be abolished or ignored.
Spain is not unique in this bind. Countries that criminalise buying while claiming to “support” sellers often leave workers with fewer practical tools to screen, organise, or report violence. Countries that never pass either abolition or recognition leave a different kind of vacuum: no crime on the books for the act itself, and almost no rights attached to the job. Spain currently sits closer to the second pattern at national level, while local and regional rules do the everyday enforcement work.
The political fight will continue. Trafficking and coercion remain crimes and should. The question the stalemate keeps deferring is narrower and more practical: what status, if any, does the state grant adults who sell sex by choice, and what protections follow from that status? Until someone answers it in law, workers will keep operating in the grey — visible enough to be fined, not visible enough to be protected.