Like most teenagers of my time, I enjoyed the writing of British author H G Wells. Especially The War of the Worlds, The Time Machine, and The Invisible Man.
Winston Churchill was an avid reader of Wells.
After Convid I watched three movies, Brave New World by Aldous Huxley (1980), 1984 by George Orwell (1984), and Things to Come by H G Wells (1936).
Subsequently I have come to the conclusion that famous authors who appear to be miraculous predictors of the future are simply informers of plans which they have become privy to, usually by way of secret society membership such as the Freemasons.
I would include contemporary writers in this conclusion, such as Stephen King, Dean Koontz, and Matt Groening (The Simpsons writer).
However, as evidenced by online searches, this conclusion is simply considered a conspiracy theory.
I was intrigued to find that H G Wells had written a book entitled The New World Order in 1940.
The audiobook is available free to listen to on YouTube here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQlZGNLqQwM
The book was written after the perceived failure of the League of Nations.
It was one of 18 advisory texts used in the first draft of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and influenced the United Nations Commission on Human Rights.
Ironically though, the idea of a planned New World Order by the UN is still labelled as a conspiracy theory.
The first two thirds of the book attacks every political system, including Marxism, Communism, Capitalism, and Federalism.
Then there is a list of ten human rights which Wells considered vital to the success of the New World Order.
The book concludes that the world is inevitably heading towards a slow-moving revolution which will lead to a one world government, international police, the abolition of national sovereignty, and radical changes to the monetary system.
The somewhat naïve utopia is referred to as world collectivism, world socialism, and a world social democracy (with liberal values).
Sound familiar? Well, it will if you read the United Nations Agendas 21 and 30, which ALL of your leaders signed in 1992, and 2015.
Words such as “common purpose” and “sustainability” pop up often throughout the book.
Not surprisingly at the time of its publication the book received criticism.
Interestingly, George Orwell said, “what is the use in stating that a world state is desirable? What matters is that not one of the five military powers would think of submitting to such a thing.”
My criticism of the book is that are no substantive submissions as to why a one world government would succeed.
Going back to my original comment about “informers” rather than “predictors”, Wells makes scarily accurate predictions about the future of Germany and Russia, which have all turned out to be true, including that Germany will prosper greatly after World War 2, and may have to later control the southern European states which are excessively attached to national sovereignty and identity. In other words, Germany will lead policy in the EU due to their financial success.
He also comments that the USA and UK will slowly become socialist societies perhaps without the people realising it.
He mentions the international movement of populations around the world for purposes of fulfilling labour shortage demands, and he openly praises the modern approach of Sweden.
A total polar opposite to this book is Myron Fagan’s remarkable speech of 1967 in which he warned about the UN and the New World Order, found here:
https://rumble.com/v1e6nmb-myron-fagan-exposes-the-illuminaticfr-1967.html
We could give H G Wells the benefit of the doubt, and just conclude that he was a disillusioned author who wanted a better peaceful world.
However, one thing I did discover which I thought was odd was found in the 1936 movie Things to Come, written by H G Wells himself.
Here is the movie on YouTube:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=knOd-BhRuCE
At 36 minutes into this film when the new world order hero is telling people that he and his people had devised a way to prevent all wars, he states, “The brotherhood of efficiency. The freemasonry of science.”
