While many practicing in the field of behavior analysis would like to believe the general populace has an accurate understanding of the science, it can’t be ignore that quite the opposite is true. Spend a few minutes googling “ABA” and one can find there is a plethora of misinformation and misunderstandings about the application of behavior analysis. And while the first reaction may be defensive, it’s worth taking a breath, a pause, and listening to the concerns and statements. Research and applications are just as susceptible to reinforcement as the humans involved in those systems. But! There is still a light at the end of a narrowly closing tunnel!
In this LIVE talk we’re meeting with Nicholas (he/they), MAMFT, MSPSY, LBA, CSC, and BCBA to unpack how applied behavior analysis started, how systems and contingencies have shaped the field into what it is now, and what can be done to regain trust in the science. He’ll also discuss how he implements some creative solutions to support the complex needs of the individuals he works with, while still practicing in the parameters of the science.
Listen here: https://atypicalba.com/podcast/ep39-separating-science-and-application-ethics/
or on your favorite listening platform!
Learning Objectives:
Review the history of (applied) behavior analysis and describe the critical variables that differentiate behavior analysis as a science compared to what the general population considers “ABA”.
Describe the impact and barriers that these changes in perception/understanding/interpretation have generated on the systems and cultures neurodivergent individuals have to navigate including insurance and interventions/treatment.
Provide examples of creative interventions to help teach new and complex skills while still following the seven dimensions of behavior analysis.
Worth 1.5 Learning, 1.5 Ethics CEUs