It’s puzzling why is it that when someone criticizes the president’s policies, many ordinary citizens end up attacking the critic instead? Instead of focusing on the substance of the issue, the debate often devolves into citizens attacking one another!
Let’s take a relaxed look at the psychological and social phenomena behind this “defend the president” phenomenon!
The Psychology of ‘Identity Fusion’ & Feeling Under Attack
According to Social Identity Theory, supporters view the president as a symbol of their group. There’s a phenomenon known as identity-protective cognition and identity fusion, where criticism of a leader is perceived as a personal attack on them.
A Common Misconception: The President Is Not the State
Some people mistakenly equate the President, the Government, and the State. Yet in a democracy, the people hold the highest sovereignty, while the president is merely a representative. Public criticism is not treason rather, it is an essential check to prevent the abuse of power.
Economic Factors & Class Self-Esteem
For vulnerable citizens who depend on social assistance, defending the leader is a means of survival to ensure their aid remains secure. There is also “class dignity,” where the leader is viewed as a symbol of hope and a protector of the self-respect of the lower classes.
The Essence of Democracy, Defend the People, Not the Figure
Defending the president from criticism is not necessarily the same as defending the common people. On the contrary, the courage to correct flawed policies is a true form of defense for vulnerable communities.
In conclusion, blindly defending a figure often obscures public accountability. Healthy political loyalty should prioritize transparency and the people’s interests above all else.
Let’s be a society that views policies critically and objectively. Remember, true power lies in the hands of the people, and criticism is the best form of love for our country!