How can they don't know what you're thinking? This brings to mind a few quotes.
"Control your mind or it will be controlled for you." ― Napoleon Hill
"It's not left or right, it's us or them." ― Antony C. Sutton
“If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.” ― Sun Tzu, The Art of War
The "divide and conquer" tactic is often used in the Art of War. All wars involve the art of deception and in every conflict, a dichotomy of categories exists or is created. All wars are banksters' wars.
"All wars are carefully staged World Order productions". Contrived and orchestrated. All ideologies are Rothschild creations. They want you to believe in one, so that you can fight believers in one of their other ideologies, instead of fighting them." ― Eustace Mullins (1923 - 2010)
I'm certain that many are familiar with the saying "When you assume, you make an ass out of you and me." In this particular write-up 'Presumption' seems to be even more nefarious as even silence can be considered an answer. The term is to Acquiesce.
Your silence may be interpreted as an admission of guilt to the accusation.
I've heard that 'LAW' stands for L.and, A.ir, and W.ater where Land is Equity, Air is Trust, and Water is Contract.
When you walk into a courtroom Judge's Jurisdiction, at least 'Twelve Presumptions' Are Already In Force – Without Your Knowledge Or Consent!
Jurisdiction is the authority to administer justice by hearing and determining controversies.
Have you ever asked yourself what is the difference between lawful and legal?
“Lawful” properly implies a thing conformable to or enjoined by law; “Legal”, is a thing in the form or after the manner of law or binding by law. In summary, lawful behavior is behavior that is in SUBSTANCE with the law, while legal behavior is behavior that is the PRESENCE by the law.
Cannon Law researcher Frank O’Collins (ucadia.org) ferreted out these presumptions and helped make them available to the general population.
We cannot forget that our so-called ‘courts’ are run by a private guild by the name of the British Accreditation Regency. (The BAR and their BAR Card.)
The following is an excerpt from the book 'Fruit from a Poisonous Tree' (page 58) by attorney Melvin Stamper, JD: “The scheme also provided for the control of the courts via the 1913 creation of the American Bar Association, whose parent organization was the European International Bar Association, which was the creation of Rothschild.
This allowed the International Bankers to control the practice of law, in that, the only ones permitted to practice before the courts were those who were educated under their brand of law, which was only Admiralty and Contract law. The common law of the people was to be replaced as it gave the 'natural man' many jurisdictional protections from the bankers’ legislation.”
Since the time of Napoleon in the late 18th century, the Rothschilds have been the ruling banking family on the planet. Via their central banking monopoly, they've been able to not only control the money of most Nations but also to control its issuance.
A YouTube content creator named Robert Retlowsky mentioned that 'common law' is the unwritten law of reason or that which is reasonable between two men. It is basically to not harm another or their property and to honor contracts.
Robb Ryder: Writ of Mandamus https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gd4kbTB5Cvs&t=4s
Canon 3228: (Cannon Law researcher Frank O’Collins (ucadia.org)
A Roman Court does not operate according to any true rule of law but by presumptions of the law. Therefore, if presumptions presented by the private Bar Guild are not rebutted they become fact and are therefore said to stand true [Or as “truth in commerce”].
There are twelve (12) key presumptions asserted by the private Bar Guilds which if unchallenged stand true being Public Record, Public Service, Public Oath, Immunity, Summons, Custody, Court of Guardians, Court of Trustees, Government as Executor/Beneficiary, Executor De Son Tort, Incompetence, and Guilt:
1. The Presumption of Public Record - is that any matter brought before a lower Roman Courts is a matter for the public record when in fact it is presumed by the members of the private Bar Guild that the matter is a private Bar Guild business matter.
Unless openly rebuked and rejected by stating clearly the matter is to be on the Public Record, the matter remains a private Bar Guild matter completely under private Bar Guild rules; and
2. The Presumption of Public Service - is that all the members of the Private Bar Guild who have all sworn a solemn secret absolute oath to their Guild then act as public agents of the Government, or “public officials” by making additional oaths of public office that openly and deliberately contradict their private “superior” oaths to their own Guild.
Unless openly rebuked and rejected, the claim stands that these private Bar Guild members are legitimate public servants and therefore trustees under public oath; and
3. The Presumption of Public Oath - is that all members of the Private Bar Guild acting in the capacity of “public officials” who have sworn a solemn public oath remain bound by that oath and therefore bound to serve honestly, impartially, and fairly as dictated by their oath.
Unless openly challenged and demanded, the presumption stands that the Private Bar Guild members have functioned under their public oath in contradiction to their Guild oath. If challenged, such individuals must recuse themselves as having a conflict of interest and cannot possibly stand under a public oath; and
4. The Presumption of Immunity - is that key members of the Private Bar Guild in the capacity of “public officials” acting as judges, prosecutors, and magistrates who have sworn a solemn public oath in good faith are immune from personal claims of injury and liability.
Unless openly challenged and their oath demanded, the presumption stands that the members of the Private Bar Guild as public trustees acting as judges, prosecutors and magistrates are immune from any personal accountability for their actions; and
5. The Presumption of Summons - is that by custom a summons unrebutted stands and therefore one who attends Court is presumed to accept a position (defendant, juror, witness) and jurisdiction of the court. Attendance to court is usually an invitation by summons.
Unless the summons is rejected and returned, with a copy of the rejection filed before choosing to visit or attend, jurisdiction and position as the accused and the existence of “guilt” stands; and
6. The Presumption of Custody - is that by custom a summons or warrant for arrest unrebutted stands and therefore one who attends Court is presumed to be a thing and therefore liable to be detained in custody by “Custodians”. [This includes the dead legal fiction non-human “PERSON” that corporate-governments rules and regulations are written for.*]
Custodians may only lawfully hold custody of property and “things” not flesh and blood soul-possessing beings.
Unless this presumption is openly challenged by the rejection of summons and/or at court, the presumption stands you are a thing and property and therefore lawfully able to be kept in custody by custodians; and
7. The Presumption of Court of Guardians - is the presumption that as you may be listed as a “resident” of a ward of a local government area and have listed on your “passport” the letter P, you are a pauper and therefore under the “Guardian” powers of the government and its agents as a “Court of Guardians”.
Unless this presumption is openly challenged to demonstrate you are both a general guardian and general executor of the matter (trust) before the court, the presumption stands and you are by default a pauper, and lunatic and therefore must obey the rules of the clerk of guardians (clerk of magistrates court);
8. The Presumption of Court of Trustees - is that members of the Private Bar Guild presume you accept the office of trustee as a “public servant” and “government employee” just by attending a Roman Court, as such Courts are always for public trustees by the rules of the Guild and the Roman System. Unless this presumption is openly challenged to state you are merely visiting by “invitation” to clear up the matter and you are not a government employee or public trustee in this instance, the presumption stands and is assumed as one of the most significant reasons to claim jurisdiction – simply because you “appeared”; and
9. The Presumption of Government acting in two roles as Executor and Beneficiary - is that for the matter at hand, the Private Bar Guild appoints the judge/magistrate in the capacity of Executor while the Prosecutor acts in the capacity of Beneficiary of the trust for the current matter.
Unless this presumption is openly challenged to demonstrate you are both a general guardian and general executor of the matter (trust) before the court, the presumption stands and you are by default the trustee, and therefore must obey the rules of the executor (judge/magistrate); and
10. The Presumption of Executor De Son Tort - is the presumption that if the accused does seek to assert their right as Executor and Beneficiary over their body, mind, and soul they are acting as an Executor De Son Tort or a “false executor” challenging the “rightful” judge as Executor. Therefore, the judge/magistrate assumes the role of “true” executor and has the right to have you arrested, detained, fined, or forced into a psychiatric evaluation.
Unless this presumption is openly challenged by not only asserting one’s position as Executor as well as questioning if the judge or magistrate is seeking to act as Executor De Son Tort, the presumption stands and a judge or magistrate of the private Bar guild may seek to the assistance of bailiffs or sheriffs to assert their false claim; and
11. The Presumption of Incompetence - is the presumption that you are at least ignorant of the law and, therefore incompetent to present yourself and argue properly. Therefore, the judge/magistrate as executor has the right to have you arrested, detained, fined, or forced into a psychiatric evaluation.
Unless this presumption is openly challenged to the fact that you know your position as executor and beneficiary and actively rebuke and object to any contrary presumptions, then it stands by the time of pleading that you are incompetent then the judge or magistrate can do what they need to keep you obedient; and
12. The Presumption of Guilt - is the presumption that as it is presumed to be a private business meeting of the Bar Guild, you are guilty whether you plead “guilty”, do not plead, or plead “not guilty”.
Therefore unless you either have previously prepared an affidavit of truth and motion to dismiss with extreme prejudice onto the public record or call a demurrer, then the presumption is you are guilty and the private Bar Guild can hold you until a bond is prepared to guarantee the amount the guild wants to profit from you.
I've always had questions about the courts and their M.O.(Modus Operandi) for justice.
The Twelve Presumptions of Law is an interesting bit to contemplate.
It's disheartening nowadays when words and deeds have double standards, often in front of your face and in plain sight.
What is a woman? What is terrorism? What is 'hate speech'?
Let's leave it to the evilarchy/Banksters directed courts to decide. In my youth, I learned that 'sticks and stones may break my bones but words will never hurt me.'
The courts nowadays have not only made freedom of speech a crime, but now they try to compel your speech with their rulings.
"Control language and you control thought; control thought and you control action; control action and you control the world." – Peter Kreeft (1937)
There are two ways to be fooled. One is to believe what isn’t true; the other is to refuse to believe what is true.” – Søren Kierkegaard
Wake the hell up 'Mankind' before these sons of perdition drive off a cliff with all of us in the backseat.